> what did California do for its residents (the answer is: nothing)
That is not true either. There is a very low property tax for the long-time residents. That incentive, in turn, makes it harder to modernize the houses and infrastructure. Which results in Internet infrastructure quality lagging behind.
Wait, not charging 20k a year people that bought their home 30 years ago for 150k, you call it "doing something for them"? Funny. Мог бы бритвой по глазам, как говорится.
It's a rich state, with pretty high sales taxes, with a lot of rich companies; the problem is, they waste money on all kinds of bullshit. Schools management instead of teachers. Prisons. High-speed railway, which turns out to be not so high-speed, but much higher price. Etc. Internets is not the state business, it's the companies that are probably being overcharged for doing business here.
I don't need anybody to help me modernize my house, I'm doing it myself.
It is something. The funny thing is that it is a trap: you get your 20k/year tax break and the consequence is that everything else around you is overpriced.
> High-speed railway,
... is the result of not having enough roads. There are not enough roads, because new construction is discouraged. New construction is discouraged, in part, because there is a tax break for the property that was bought many years ago.
В Коннектикуте (да и вообще в прибрежных городах North-East of the US) - проблемы с инфраструктурой похожи на проблемы в Silicon Valley. В результате, качество интернета низковатое, хотя и приемлемое.
сгоняй к ним в сервис-центр, смени роутер и вероятно тебе сделают бесплатно или за + 10 в месяц втрое быстрее DL и в полтора раза быстрее UL У меня сейчас 194 DL/ 35 UL. По вечерам, когда весь народ в округе лезет на ютюб и нетфликс скорость падает примерно в полтора раза, но видео смотреть с инета это не мешает. Сейчас я плачу 75 баксов за интернет.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
no subject
Here are my results (to AT&T server in Seattle):
http://beta.speedtest.net/result/6726636676
PING 85 ms
DOWNLOAD 110.27 Mbps
UPLOAD 49.41 Mbps
What are your results to AT&T server in Seattle?
no subject
no subject
И ping быстрый.
no subject
Например, в Seattle, WA
Это даст более реалистичную картину.
no subject
У меня за те же деньги в пять раз медленнее.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
That is not true either.
There is a very low property tax for the long-time residents.
That incentive, in turn, makes it harder to modernize the houses and infrastructure.
Which results in Internet infrastructure quality lagging behind.
no subject
It's a rich state, with pretty high sales taxes, with a lot of rich companies; the problem is, they waste money on all kinds of bullshit. Schools management instead of teachers. Prisons. High-speed railway, which turns out to be not so high-speed, but much higher price. Etc. Internets is not the state business, it's the companies that are probably being overcharged for doing business here.
I don't need anybody to help me modernize my house, I'm doing it myself.
no subject
It is something. The funny thing is that it is a trap: you get your 20k/year tax break and the consequence is that everything else around you is overpriced.
> High-speed railway,
... is the result of not having enough roads.
There are not enough roads, because new construction is discouraged.
New construction is discouraged, in part, because there is a tax break for the property that was bought many years ago.
За те же деньги
Всё врут. Видео прерывается. Чертовы монополии давят скорость
Re: За те же деньги
Re: За те же деньги
Re: За те же деньги
В результате, качество интернета низковатое, хотя и приемлемое.
Re: За те же деньги
У меня сейчас 194 DL/ 35 UL. По вечерам, когда весь народ в округе лезет на ютюб и нетфликс скорость падает примерно в полтора раза, но видео смотреть с инета это не мешает. Сейчас я плачу 75 баксов за интернет.
Re: За те же деньги
no subject
нет, на Украине жить пока можно:)
no subject
no subject
no subject
У нас гораздо дороже.
no subject